ABSTRACT
Introduction: The aim of mandibular fracture treatment isto restore the pre-injury anatomic form and function, withparticular care to establish the occlusion. Of the varioustreatment modalities available, Champys miniplate fixation hasbecome the most widely used technique. The 3-dimensional(3D) plating for mandibular fracture treatment is relativelynew. This study was conducted to compare efficacy, stabilityand rigidity of 3-dimensional plates with that of 2mm titaniumminiplates in the surgical management of anterior mandibularfractures.Material and Methods: The study was conducted on 70patients with anterior mandbibular fractures (Symphysis andParasymphysis region). Patients were randomly divided intotwo groups, Group I (n=35) in which the patients underwentfixation by miniplates (2 nos) while in Group II (n=35), 3Dplates were used for fixation. The patients preoperative, intraoperative and post-operative clinical and radiological findingswere recorded in a proforma and were subjected to statisticalanalysis. Fisher’s Exact Test was used to compare the dataobtained from group I and group II patients.Results: Out of 70 patients, 77.14% corresponded to the agegroup of 15-30 years and 82.85% were males. Road trafficaccident (80) % was the leading cause of fracture. The timerequired to adapt and fix the miniplates was slightly more than3-D plates and results were statistically significant. Skeletaland occlusal stability was maintained in both group.Conclusion: There is no major difference in terms of treatmentoutcome in both systems, and both are equally effective inmandibular fracture treatment.